What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
13.06.2025 03:57
Or do not. Yoda won’t take them odds, and you shouldn’t aspire to be some critic’s forceless green-tinged puppet, whether cartoon or foam rubber: IT STANK EVERYWHERE BUT THE BOX OFFICE, and buddy?
Touch!
The original authors did.
Is “it” an art at all?
Let’s not get personal. A woman, even a very young and competitive woman far too good for the likes, loves, needs or wants of me (or you, for that matter) is only called a “dog” by some sour grapes loser. Or! Hey, if she must love dogs, maybe she won’t even mind being called in a doggy style?
Well, duh. More than that: TUH-DUH. TA-DA! It means the words! It means each and only what the words say. Read ’em and weep not! See? Right up there for you. SEE? See!
The thing really done.
It is yours. Your own. Don’t be too precious about it, please. Shoot me a comment below: tell me what’s moving in you, easily or uneasily as you listen for yourself to the song (below!), and judge it for all that it is, or isn’t. For what they have done, or for what they have failed to do: in you.
It is what the thing itself meant in you. Or: means to you, coming forward now.
Do you have any problem dating a younger man?
What more could one ask of a work of art? Sometime, maybe try to ask the song itself what it means.
A song made for public consumption has no “real meaning” beyond what it means to you: the hearer. The listener, ideally. The artist, the creator, the originator or the band of record merely bring you the best they could put out to move you, given available talent and production time. So?
CALL THE MEN OF SCIENCE
What are some questions obviously just asked for sexual gratification?
In many circles (and the glorious art that erupts and cruises forth from these circles is not to be puked at), what’s vulgar is pretty always a-gonna be a good bet: to pop.
worn...etc.
Did it stink for you, or were you moved to applaud? Don’t be shy.
"Gasping": Scientists Make Breakthrough Toward Full Cure for HIV - futurism.com
WERE WRONG, the world's address! A place that's
What the singer or writer, the true creator, the artist (modern, classic, wise or otherwise) thinks it should mean in addition to what they’ve indeed made is…puff. Fluff. Tacky add-on, at best.
Now pull the other one! How did it make YOU feel, about your mother for instance?
How will the article end in Part III of Gleissner's hit piece?
You decide. Purpose is what you put into life.
“The Word’s Address”
Behold!
Is it sinful for Christians to look at beautiful women?
I can see your secrets
It means what it is, not what some paid or unpaid maker thinks it should mean to you. Kind of like oh, I don’t know, Neil Diamond? Neil Sedaka? Bing Crosby? I’ve no idea really. Elvis Costello? Aimee Mann? Sean Penn’s sister-in-law? The Beatles? Who gives a rat’s toss? These people were paid and paid handsomely to prettily dish up something for us, for us to take in and mean, and feel. And sure, think! Why not?
Look.
Disabuse you of that “secret meaning” or “real meaning” nonsense notion pronto and galore! I mean consistently, coherently, cogently and with integrity: in every onstage bout of audience-aimed grateful candor, plus every interview segment you’re likely catch them in, speaking for themselves to all the world: unabashed, unashamed, not too guardedly at all.
It means an “accomplished fact.” Something that has already been done, and there it is: “that’s-that.”
Just leaves me depressed
This all holds true for every thing called art, in every form of art, or called art.
How are you moved? It’s not a f***ing contest. Why would anyone want to WIN a f***ing contest? Oh, that triple asterisk stands for “art” not “uck.” Pretty yucky, that droll substitution. Pretty disgusting, those who try to pass it off as “fresh.”
It ain’t the thing. Is it?
THE WORLD'S ADDRESS
It is trivia.
Official audio only.
Why did the American's mulberry harbor not hold up after D-Day?
Shall we uphold that craptastically egotistical self-shoveling attitude? Why should we? Because we, two should be famous for moving the world with what moves us in art? Hey.
Anyone who wants to pretend their free gift to the world means something other than what they actually made and gave is welcome to be that pretentious.
I say leave that to the one being called, Holmes. Or…sure, lock your tongue away behind your lips and bite yourself, hard! Why offend needlessly over what amounts to a nickname? Must you?
Have you ever accidentally found out that you were about to be fired?
Big “A” or little? Done for Art’s sake, or just for free sushi and sake? Got anything for us, anything for each or all? GIVE IT UP, HOMO SAPIEN.
Nobody could possibly credit my take over and above or underneath the text itself, the thing itself: the actual work and nothing else. Nothing but. All that’s in or within it. Right?
Give us what cha got, “artist.” If indeed you consider yourself an artist: give it up. For all we the living, for any and each who might be moved, AND HOW.
That doesn’t mean the trivialist has some secret special key and code in their possession. They’re just kinky like that: like to be deep in the loopy sh!t. Smells like some way too-old pretend teen’s spirit hit the fan again, though. VULGAR.
Answer one. “What song” indeed! I’m listening to "The World's Address":
I’m so mean I mean it all.
Who do you say I am? Some “grammar anarch & semantic champion” for the people!
No critic and no investor, no, not even any Capital-A Author or Major League Maker can add one jot, jolt, titter or teardrop to the finished work of art. As it was, or as it lasts in its finished form.
The world's address
No need to confess
Frankly, The Dead’ve never been the same since Garcia died, except on record and if you take a lot of drugs, too. Got Art?
Not I.
Call it an affectionym, but be sure the other wants yours first. It isn’t a very high art to be sure, this dealing and doling of names. Lables and boxes, more often than not? Empty of everything but nerve, bile and gall. Turn your head and cough, please. Yes!
Taste!
A sad pun that reflects a sadder mess
Life's parade of fashion
HAH. HA! No! How could I possibly be, about something as trite as art has in our day and age become? Grossaroo!
I men: you’d have to be a surefire every-miss dweeb of cretinous nature to credit what I have to say here with authority, or even a slick, greasy Greek booty-toot of value. GROSS. GROW UP, if so! Get a real load on!
Yet…
I'll repeat it for those who may not have already guessed:
Not in some misbegotten competition with the dead.
This isn’t a matter for seriousness.
Take it in every sensory or sensual way it exists, by any medium presented! Like, love, want, even need, and even share that with others! Your own lived experience of the thing itself, yeah-heah!
Kind of like John Linnell, John Flansburgh & The Band Of Dans (who hadn’t yet joined the bandwagon as of the above-limned song’s original finished debut).
It is we the living who’ll each decide what it means: to each and all.
I like to enjoy music, literally. Just the text, just what it says.
Whose song is it, any old way?
AND LET THEM HEAR THIS SONNNG
A finished work. A “fait accompli.”
Who says what’s art? The Modernists united in a real cheap-shot art-critic sold and commanded zeitgeist ventriloquism voice: The Artist! Art Is Whatever The Artist Nominates As Art!
You gonna tell us the mere author or creator of a work gets to decide for YOU what it means?
“The text” here means only: the entire artwork of whatever kind. Picasso’s Guernica is a text. Citizen Kane is a text. “The World’s Address” is our text, for this instance.
…this is all very well beyond what the thing itself means, or meant. It is new.
Why be a turd about it, stuffing imaginary made-up “author’s intent” (beyond what the author actually DID do, DID make whole) into some fantasy “envelope-pushing” exercise?
Nope. It isn’t the thing.
TELL THEM ALBERT EINSTEIN AND COPERNICUS
Yes! You nailed it! A “full-on slob-mode aficionado of pop cultural forms” to boot! Who minds what I, some rando asshat off the internet, told YOU couched so hot, deep and hard in threadbare shorts, rocking and a-rolling on a huge leather sofa stolen from “schools” and “styles” of old thought, “BUD”? Not it!
Is that what you think of IT? Of art? Or if you’re a real capital-A ASS, of “Art”?
Under every garment I can see the world's address
Everyone looks naked when you know the world's address
What kind of hack art critique confidence job (or “fanfic”) would you like us to call that crap?
Nothing beyond what was literally made part of the song is the song’s meaning.
I’ve got to be some kind of “sense, senses or sensual snob” who wants to root like King Tut on human growth hormones and steal your golden moment right out from under you, right?
You say. You’re the one to be moved, after all. In the “final anal”—what some call the “final” analysis. Why be rude? Art may be! Art may be the rudest thing in the world, taken out of its own natural time, place and culture! Pay heed! Open your eyes and let your tongue waggle like a slug!
Art is what moves you in ways mere craft could not.
I’m not sure if it’s like Wet Leg. I haven’t really drawn a bead on Wet Leg yet. Look.
Vulgar?
Here’s the musical recording from the band They call “TMBG”
Hear!
Popular, yes. That’s what vulgar originally meant.
So be it, then!
The thing itself is the thing itself.
Bull. The public has always known better than that. It isn’t novelty of theoretic conception that makes good art. It is truth. It is beauty. Which can include: hideous ugliness, if true. Or: hideous ugliness, if for some reason you the viewer, the onlooker, the innocent bystander, the paying customer or the passerby decide: I rather like the feel and style of that hideous thing.
Check between one or the other set of your cheeks, and go blow.
Care to have a listen?
Q. What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
Am I serious?
Would be wildly, reasonably sane to call “BULL’S-HIT!” on such fancy-shmancy anti-bullseye potshots.
It’s one motive, at least. If that’s your meaning then run off with it and see who’ll bow, buy, or slap a bow-tie on it for a garrotte. The rest of us?
You know it.
This is each person’s moving contribution to any work of art: to say how it moved in you.
So…you can read the lyrics above. Those words, in that simple order? That IS what the song really means.
Every meaning is valid to the degree it can be supported from within the text.
A great deal like Robert Frost. “No musician!” would you say? HA. HA! HA! HA! Nonsense!
I’m plain-out roaring, here!
A. See below. It’s a 2-Parter!
Why even read my take on what it means? You think my “hot insider intel” can override, overrule or otherwise upset the work itself: in all it truly IS? Can interpretation unseat the text?
Now my tearstains on the wall reflect an ugly sight
Feel!
Everybody’s got one.
There is no “code” in art to break.
Why should anyone swallow it? Except for what IT truly is? Your own original production! At best or at worst, “based on” or “inspired by” the thing itself.
It, whatever the heck it is or may be to someone, doesn’t really mean anything else but its own real features and properties. The thing itself is what must mean, and the only thing that can mean: to anyone, everyone, okay uh-huh alright forever and ever amen.
A deft touch like Peter Gabriel, in such regards.
A place that's worn
Couldn't sleep last night
What does it mean to me?
Context is not “key.”
A whole lot like AC/DC, Sia Furler and The Black Keys! Great pool hall music, the lot of them!
Don’t believe the hype.
The sales and marketing job (includes all backstory and behind-the-bio of the real maker, doer, makers or doers) is nothing to do with the genuine article: the act performed, the thing made.
Is that what you think of me?
Not at all like Pet Shop Boys, but who really is these days? Beyond Tennant and Lowe, no one has ever been very much like those Pet Shop Boys, actually.
Hold!
I know you've deceived me
Some lovely story about what the artist went through prior to making the thing? Human interest, yes! We love to be deep in the gossip, we kind and faithful beings. Yet is this OF the artwork? No.
I didn’t tell you what it meant.
They told you simply: by making the whole thing, nothing less. Nothing more. In every single word strong strung in sequence.
This is They Might Be Giants, and contrary to the dull, glistening and listless imaginations of self-perverted twerps who think songs have “real” or “secret” meanings that only the author or authors could tell you, John L. & John F. of They Might Be Giants will lay it all right out on the line for you every time I’ve ever seen ’em get into it.
We humans do love trivia, and some of us: we love it more than art.
Context (since there’s every single context you or anyone could choose to clap on top of it or pretend-slide beneath any artwork) is keyhole.
Whatever each viewer, hearer, taker-in and receiver “gets” out of it is, if anything, that critic or fan’s own personal production. Of what? Meaning. Value. Worth. Call it by any metric you can lay forth or set out: it’s pure personal judgment in play now, dog. Cur. Bitch?
Whatsoever is moved in you: now THAT you can know!
Meaning is what you get out of it.
It is background intel, no part of the work at all, at all.
I’m far worse than serious on such scores: I’m sincere.